lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for December 3
Hello,

On 12/03/2009 04:40 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
> todays tree is working on MMU microblaze correctly without any visible
> problem but noMMU microblaze kernel still have that bug as I reported
> some days ago.

Other than triggering WARN_ON(), it doesn't cause any other problems,
right? It's probably because SMP_CACHE_BYTES on that configuration is
lower than 8. What is the value of SMP_CACHE_BYTES on the
configuration? Also, doesn't the Linus's tree have the same problem?

The somewhat spurious WARN_ON() in percpu allocator should probably be
just removed or bumped to check against PAGE_SIZE as SMP code does.
The problem is that on UP even though the function takes @align
parameter, it just ignores it. :-(

Thanks.

--
tejun


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-12-03 09:33    [W:0.057 / U:0.476 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site