lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/7] utrace/ptrace
> As Oleg mentioned, I have a cleanup/reimplementation of seccomp using
> utrace. That is quite a trivial use--it demonstrates how easy the
> utrace API makes it to do things like that, in contrast to previous
> solutions with arch-specific assembly hacking and so forth. I can
> dust that patch off and post it if anybody cares.

Do you have an estimate or better numbers how the overhead of
seccomp-over-utrace compares to the current in-tree seccomp?

-Andi

--
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-12-23 20:49    [W:2.935 / U:0.820 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site