lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: workqueue thing
From
Date
On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 08:50 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> > 3) gets fragile at memory-pressure/reclaim
>
> Shared dynamic pool is going to be affected by memory pressure no
> matter how you implement it. cmwq tries to maintain stable level of
> workers and has forward progress guarantee. If you're gonna do shared
> pool, it can't get much better.

And here I'm questioning the very need for shared stuff, I don't see
any. That is, I'm not seeing it being worth the hassle.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-12-22 12:11    [W:2.083 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site