[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] libata: pata_bf54x: handle portmuxing of pins through GPIO PORTs
On 12/21/2009 09:21 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 14:07, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> By default, the PATA pins are routed to the async address lines in which
>>> case, no peripheral muxing needs to be done. However, if the pins get
>>> routed through the GPIO PORTs pins, we need to make sure to request them
>>> so that the muxing is properly set up.
>>> ---
>>> Andrew: could you pick this up ? it was posted over a month ago to the
>>> Linux/IDE list w/no feedback.
>> Although it is disappointing that your patch was missed -- our apologies --
>> I don't think the best response was to elide linux-ide and the libata
>> maintainer, in favor of a higher noise list. :)
>> I have the patch queued, now.
> so it's been 8 months since it was posted, 6 months since it was
> queued, and multiple libata merges have been made, but this patch has
> yet to make it into mainline ...

No idea how it got lost :( Just sent a pull request to Linus with this
in it.


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-12-21 20:01    [W:0.058 / U:1.740 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site