Messages in this thread |  | | | Subject | Re: x264 benchmarks BFS vs CFS | | From | Mike Galbraith <> | | Date | Sun, 20 Dec 2009 16:51:16 +0100 |
| |
On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 16:13 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 13:10 +0100, Kasper Sandberg wrote: > > > and as for CFS, it SHOULD exhibit fair behavior anyway, isnt it called > > "completely FAIR scheduler" ? or is that just the marketing name? > > Clue: CFS _did_ distribute CPU evenly. Ponder that for a moment.
All done?
Do you think THAT may be why I thought Con might be interested?!?
-Mike
|  |