lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: x264 benchmarks BFS vs CFS
FromMike Galbraith <>
DateSun, 20 Dec 2009 16:51:16 +0100
On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 16:13 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 13:10 +0100, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
>
> > and as for CFS, it SHOULD exhibit fair behavior anyway, isnt it called
> > "completely FAIR scheduler" ? or is that just the marketing name?
>
> Clue: CFS _did_ distribute CPU evenly. Ponder that for a moment.

All done?

Do you think THAT may be why I thought Con might be interested?!?

-Mike



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-12-20 16:55    [from the cache]
©2003-2010