Messages in this thread |  | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/7] sched: refactor try_to_wake_up() | | From | Mike Galbraith <> | | Date | Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:10:18 +0100 |
| |
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 18:51 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello,
Greetings,
> > I think it would _look_ better with the thing just > > duplicated/stripped down and called what it is, > > sched_notifier_wakeup() or such. > > Sorry, I'm not following. Can you elaborate a bit?
I mean copying ttwu, stripping out locking etc, and renaming the result would look better. No functional difference though, and binary growth would be left in the wake of such a duplication.
-Mike
|  |