Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:48:02 +0900 | From | Hiroshi Shimamoto <> | Subject | Re: revert "config FS_JOURNAL_INFO" |
| |
Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > On 12/18/09, Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com> wrote: >> So we never allow to make memory usage small with providing an option >> to remove unused area, right? > > We certainly allow this if it results in zero loss in functionality.
Thanks for clarifying this topic.
If you don't mind could you please tell me what zero loss is? I don't think I could get it exactly.
Is it OK that removing journal_info if !CONFIG_BLOCK?
> >> If I want to reduce memory usage by this way, should I keep >> this kind of patches out of tree? > > Certainly nobody can prohibit you from keeping patch out of tree. > But if you want something mainlinable, moving ->journal_info > to fs-specific data structures should do the trick. Or something.
Thanks for the advice, I'll look at this.
Thanks, Hiroshi
| |