lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    Patch in this message
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/5] hpsa: Fix incorrect SCSI status reporting


    --- On Tue, 12/8/09, Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> wrote:

    > From: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
    > Subject: [PATCH 4/5] hpsa: Fix incorrect SCSI status reporting
    > To: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
    > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mikem@beardog.cce.hp.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, smcameron@yahoo.com
    > Date: Tuesday, December 8, 2009, 3:38 PM
    > From: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
    >
    > hpsa: Fix incorrect SCSI status reporting
    >
    > Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
    > ---
    > drivers/scsi/hpsa.c |    5 +----
    > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
    >
    > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c b/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c
    > index 0e696ee..380236a 100644
    > --- a/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c
    > +++ b/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c
    > @@ -930,7 +930,7 @@ static void
    > complete_scsi_command(struct CommandList *cp,
    >
    >     cmd->result = (DID_OK << 16);
    >         /* host byte */
    >     cmd->result |= (COMMAND_COMPLETE << 8);    /* msg byte */
    > -    cmd->result |= (ei->ScsiStatus);
    > +    cmd->result |= (ei->ScsiStatus << 1);

    I don't think this is correct.

    I got fooled by some code in other drivers (3w-9xxx.c, gdth.c)
    which use CHECK_CONDITION, and shift it left 1, but I failed to notice
    that CHECK_CONDITION is defined to be 0x01, not 0x02.

    Might be nice if there were some macros or helper functions
    for setting the status bytes in scsi.h (there are some for
    unpacking, but not for packing, but drivers mainly need to
    pack these, not unpack them.)

    Will send a patch tomorrow in any case.

    -- steve


    >
    >     /* copy the sense data whether we need
    > to or not. */
    >     memcpy(cmd->sense_buffer,
    > ei->SenseInfo,
    > @@ -991,7 +991,6 @@ static void
    > complete_scsi_command(struct CommandList *cp,
    >
    >
    >            
    > /* Must be some other type of check condition */
    > -           
    > cmd->result |= (ei->ScsiStatus << 1);
    >            
    > dev_warn(&h->pdev->dev, "cp %p has check
    > condition: "
    >            
    >         "unknown type: "
    >            
    >         "Sense: 0x%x, ASC:
    > 0x%x, ASCQ: 0x%x, "
    > @@ -1013,8 +1012,6 @@ static void
    > complete_scsi_command(struct CommandList *cp,
    >          * Pass it
    > up to the upper layers...
    >          */
    >         if
    > (ei->ScsiStatus) {
    > -
    > -           
    > cmd->result |= (ei->ScsiStatus << 1);
    >            
    > dev_warn(&h->pdev->dev, "cp %p has status 0x%x "
    >            
    >     "Sense: 0x%x, ASC: 0x%x, ASCQ: 0x%x, "
    >            
    >     "Returning result: 0x%x\n",
    >
    >



    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-12-17 00:03    [W:0.027 / U:29.752 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site