Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:51:11 +0100 | From | Jens Axboe <> | Subject | Re: kexec boot regression |
| |
On Tue, Dec 15 2009, Yinghai Lu wrote: > Jens Axboe wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 15 2009, Yinghai Lu wrote: > >> [PATCH] x86/pci: intel ioh bus num reg accessing fix > >> > >> it is above 0x100, so if mmconf is not enable, need to skip it > > > > This works, it kexecs kernels fine. But since 2.6.32 doesn't have the > > mmconf problem to begin with, are we now just working around the issue? > > SRAT still reports issues, numa doesn't work. > > that patch will be bullet proof... we need it. > > also still need to figure out why memmap range is not passed properly. > > do you mean 2.6.32 kexec 2.6.32 it have worked mmconf and numa in > second kernel?
Yes, 2.6.32 booted and 2.6.32 kexec'ed works just fine, no SRAT complaints and NUMA works fine.
-- Jens Axboe
| |