[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Async suspend-resume patch w/ completions (was: Re: Async suspend-resume patch w/ rwsems)

    On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
    > Because the PCI bridges are not the only case where it matters (I'd say they
    > are really a corner case). Basically, any two async devices separeted by a
    > series of sync ones are likely not to be suspended (or resumed) in parallel
    > with each other, because the parent is usually next to its children in dpm_list.

    Give a real example that matters.


    How hard can it be to understand: KISS. Keep It Simple, Stupid.

    I get really tired of this whole stupid async discussion, because you're
    overdesigning it.

    To a first approximation, THE ONLY THING THAT MATTERS IS USB.


     \ /
      Last update: 2009-12-15 01:13    [W:0.020 / U:0.112 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site