Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:21:29 -0800 | From | Randy Dunlap <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Fix a typo in drivers/acpi/battery.c |
| |
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:23:18 -0800 Justin P. Mattock wrote:
> On 12/13/09 15:15, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 14:48:56 -0800 Justin P. Mattock wrote: > > > >> Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@gmail.com> > >> --- > >> drivers/acpi/battery.c | 2 +- > >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c > >> index 3f4602b..cada73f 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c > >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c > >> @@ -831,7 +831,7 @@ static void acpi_battery_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event) > >> dev_name(&device->dev), event, > >> acpi_battery_present(battery)); > >> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SYSFS_POWER > >> - /* acpi_batter_update could remove power_supply object */ > >> + /* acpi_battery_update could remove power_supply object */ > >> if (battery->bat.dev) > >> kobject_uevent(&battery->bat.dev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE); > >> #endif > >> -- > > > > Hi, > > > > You don't need an intro patch email and then the patch email > > for such a simple patch. > > > > Also, please note (from "MAINTAINERS" or from scripts/get_maintainer.pl) > > that acpi patches go to linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org . > > > > --- > > ~Randy > > > > So should I resend this to acpi then, or just > take note of this the next time?
I'd say resend to linux-acpi and cc: the acpi maintainer.
--- ~Randy
| |