lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSun, 13 Dec 2009 17:21:29 -0800
FromRandy Dunlap <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Fix a typo in drivers/acpi/battery.c
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:23:18 -0800 Justin P. Mattock wrote:

> On 12/13/09 15:15, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 14:48:56 -0800 Justin P. Mattock wrote:
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/acpi/battery.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
> >> index 3f4602b..cada73f 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
> >> @@ -831,7 +831,7 @@ static void acpi_battery_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event)
> >> dev_name(&device->dev), event,
> >> acpi_battery_present(battery));
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SYSFS_POWER
> >> - /* acpi_batter_update could remove power_supply object */
> >> + /* acpi_battery_update could remove power_supply object */
> >> if (battery->bat.dev)
> >> kobject_uevent(&battery->bat.dev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE);
> >> #endif
> >> --
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > You don't need an intro patch email and then the patch email
> > for such a simple patch.
> >
> > Also, please note (from "MAINTAINERS" or from scripts/get_maintainer.pl)
> > that acpi patches go to linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org .
> >
> > ---
> > ~Randy
> >
>
> So should I resend this to acpi then, or just
> take note of this the next time?

I'd say resend to linux-acpi and cc: the acpi maintainer.

---
~Randy

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-12-14 02:23    [from the cache]
©2003-2010