[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [GIT PATCH] TTY patches for 2.6.33-git

    On Sun, 13 Dec 2009, Trond Myklebust wrote:
    > The main remaining problem area is that of file locking (i.e. anything
    > that references inode->i_flock). I've started work on that, but a couple
    > of higher interrupts have prevented me from pulling it all together in
    > time for this merge window...

    I'm pretty sure we've had at least two trees with the file locking code
    fixed, but NFS in a status of "unknown".

    If I recall correctly, the file locking code itself is not that hard:
    we've done it without the kernel lock in the past (long long ago), and the
    lock usage doesn't nest (or at least it didn't at some point back then ;).
    In fact, I think we even do the actual lock data structure allocations
    outside of the kernel lock exactly because we at one time had a patch that
    used a spinlock for protection of the lists.

    (Again, not only my memory, but the code itself may have bitrotted in the
    meantime, of course).


     \ /
      Last update: 2009-12-13 20:11    [W:0.023 / U:53.756 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site