[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC] [X86] performance improvement for memcpy_64.S by fast string.
On 11/09/2009 10:54 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> Ling's numbers didn't seem to show a significant slowdown on Core 2 (it
>> was something like 0.95x baseline in the worst case, and most of the
>> cases were positive) so Core 2 doesn't seem to have a problem.
> I ran quite a lot of micro benchmarks with various alignments and sizes
> the 'q' variant was not always a win. I haven't checked that particular
> version though.

Well, if you have concrete information about what the problem cases are,
then please provide it. If you don't, but have a hunch where these
potential problems may lie, then please indicate what they might be.
Otherwise, there isn't any actionable information here.


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-09 23:39    [W:0.058 / U:20.616 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site