[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    Subjectx86/NUMA: Reason for ignoring too small NUMA nodes?
    Hi Andi,

    while experimenting with a system with a memory-less NUMA node I
    stumbled upon code in the Linux kernel which ignores nodes containing
    less than a certain amount of RAM, obviously to fix systems with a buggy
    Can you elaborate on this? What kind of incorrect entry have you seen?
    To correctly map the memory less node I did a patch to accept at least
    nodes with exactly zero bytes of memory (read: no SRAT memory entry),
    was this special condition also present in the buggy machines?
    Another comments reads:
    * Don't confuse VM with a node that doesn't have the
    * minimum amount of memory:
    Is that still a valid statement? How can the VM get confused by a node
    with already exhausted memory resources?
    (found in arch/x86/mm/{srat,numa}_64.c)

    I'd be grateful for some hints!


    Andre Przywara
    AMD-Operating System Research Center (OSRC), Dresden, Germany
    Tel: +49 351 448 3567 12
    ----to satisfy European Law for business letters:
    Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
    Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str. 34, 85609 Dornach b. Muenchen
    Geschaeftsfuehrer: Andrew Bowd; Thomas M. McCoy; Giuliano Meroni
    Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen
    Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-11-09 13:31    [W:0.024 / U:0.176 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site