lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 9 Nov 2009 12:34:21 +0530
FromBalbir Singh <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] memcg make use of new percpu implementations
* KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> [2009-11-06 17:52:42]:

> Hi,
>
> Recent updates on dynamic percpu allocation looks good and I tries to rewrite
> memcg's poor implementation of percpu status counter.
> (It's not NUMA-aware ...)
> Thanks for great works.
>
> For this time. I added Christoph to CC because I'm not fully sure my usage of
> __this_cpu_xxx is correct...I'm glad if you check the usage when you have time.
>
>
> Patch 1/2 is just clean up (prepare for patch 2/2)
> Patch 2/2 is for percpu.
>
> Tested on my 8cpu box and works well.
> Pathcesa are against the latest mmotm.

How do the test results look? DO you see a significant boost? BTW,
I've been experimenting a bit with the earlier percpu counter patches,
I might post an iteration once I have some good results.

--
Balbir


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-09 08:07    [W:0.793 / U:0.000 seconds]
©2003-2009 Jasper Spaans