Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 4 Nov 2009 17:38:20 +0100 | From | Gabor Gombas <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] Mount point suggestions for cgroup |
| |
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 09:35:30PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> Yep, but hasn't the pollution already occured with /dev/cpuset today? > sysfs would require work for changes to /sys, so do we go with Kame's > suggestion of /cgroup?
debugfs is already under /sys.
If /dev is not popular, then how about dedicating a location (say /kernel) as a base for mounting virtual file systems? So cgroups can get /kernel/cgroup. hugetlbfs is often mounted on /dev/hugepages but that does not seem to be standardized as well, so it could be the second citizen under /kernel. configfs could be moved there too. Having a different rule for every new virtual fs does not seem to be a good idea...
Gabor
-- --------------------------------------------------------- MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute Hungarian Academy of Sciences ---------------------------------------------------------
| |