Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:11:42 -0600 | From | "Serge E. Hallyn" <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] Mount point suggestions for cgroup |
| |
Quoting Dave Hansen (dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com): > On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 13:46 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > > The reason I liked /dev/cgroup was because cpusets could be > > mounted at /dev/cpuset or /dev/cgroup/cpuset. My concern with /cgroup > > is that a ls "/" now becomes larger in size. But I'll take your vote > > for it as +1 for /cgroup. > > /dev/pts is a decent precedent for doing it under /dev, although it does > deal with actual devices. cgroups do not.
Hmm, on whose behalf are you making this decision?
LSB people will want to avoid using /cgroup, but I think a lot of admins will likely prefer /cgroup (as I do). On my systems I always use /cgroup, but would be more likely to use /mnt/cgroup over /dev/cgroup.
lxc (at lxc.sf.net) rightfully takes the cgroupfs from wherever it happens to be mounted. Do you really need a mountpoint decided?
If you do, then while I DETEST the extra typing, I think /sys/kernel/cgroup makes most sense, since that's where you find debugfs and securityfs.
-serge
| |