lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 04 Nov 2009 17:02:22 +0100
FromJan Safranek <>
SubjectRe: [RFC] Mount point suggestions for cgroup
On 11/04/2009 04:21 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 13:46 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> The reason I liked /dev/cgroup was because cpusets could be
>> mounted at /dev/cpuset or /dev/cgroup/cpuset. My concern with /cgroup
>> is that a ls "/" now becomes larger in size. But I'll take your vote
>> for it as +1 for /cgroup.
>
> /dev/pts is a decent precedent for doing it under /dev, although it does
> deal with actual devices. cgroups do not.

There is also /dev/shm, but IMHO that's not reason to pollute /dev with
filesystems that are not devices.

Jan


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-04 17:05    [from the cache]
©2003-2010