lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/14] cpumask: use struct cpumask rather than the deprecated cpumask_t

* Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h | 4 ++--
> arch/x86/lib/msr.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Mind sending this against latest -tip? We already have:

b8a4754: x86, msr: Unify rdmsr_on_cpus/wrmsr_on_cpus

which makes your patch not apply:

patching file arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 247.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
patching file arch/x86/lib/msr.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 78.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 107.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/lib/msr.c

Thanks,

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-04 13:17    [W:0.044 / U:0.344 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site