Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system? | From | Jarod Wilson <> | Date | Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:50:45 -0500 |
| |
On Nov 29, 2009, at 4:31 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2009, at 12:27 PM, Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl> wrote: > >> 1. Do we agree that a lirc (-style) kernel-user interface is needed at >> least? >> >> 2. Is there any problem with lirc kernel-user interface? >> >> If the answer for #1 is "yes" and for #2 is "no" then perhaps we merge >> the Jarod's lirc patches (at least the core) so at least the >> non-controversial part is done? > > > Isn't the meat of Jarod's patch the lirc interface?
Patch 1 was the lirc interface, 2 and 3 are individual device drivers that use it.
/me has some catching up to do on this thread after being partially detached from the computer over the holiday weekend here in the US...
-- Jarod Wilson jarod@wilsonet.com
| |