lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?
From
Date
On Nov 29, 2009, at 4:31 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:

> On Nov 29, 2009, at 12:27 PM, Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl> wrote:
>
>> 1. Do we agree that a lirc (-style) kernel-user interface is needed at
>> least?
>>
>> 2. Is there any problem with lirc kernel-user interface?
>>
>> If the answer for #1 is "yes" and for #2 is "no" then perhaps we merge
>> the Jarod's lirc patches (at least the core) so at least the
>> non-controversial part is done?
>
>
> Isn't the meat of Jarod's patch the lirc interface?

Patch 1 was the lirc interface, 2 and 3 are individual device drivers that use it.

/me has some catching up to do on this thread after being partially detached from the computer over the holiday weekend here in the US...

--
Jarod Wilson
jarod@wilsonet.com





\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-30 05:53    [W:0.185 / U:0.348 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site