lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] proc_fops: convert drivers/isdn/ to seq_file
Am 23.11.2009 02:56 schrieb Alexey Dobriyan:
> --- a/Documentation/isdn/INTERFACE.CAPI
> +++ b/Documentation/isdn/INTERFACE.CAPI
> @@ -149,8 +149,8 @@ char *(*procinfo)(struct capi_ctr *ctrlr)
> pointer to a callback function returning the entry for the device in
> the CAPI controller info table, /proc/capi/controller
>
> -read_proc_t *ctr_read_proc
> - pointer to the read_proc callback function for the device's proc file
> +const struct file_operations *proc_fops
> + pointers to callback functions for the device's proc file
> system entry, /proc/capi/controllers/<n>; will be called with a
> pointer to the device's capi_ctr structure as the last (data) argument
>

This doesn't look correct. AFACIS, most of the callback functions in proc_fops
don't have a last argument named data or looking as if it might lend itself to
passing a pointer to the device's capi_ctr structure. In fact, later in your
patch you replace uses of that last argument by accesses to the m->private
member of the struct seq_file *m argument, like here:

> --- a/drivers/isdn/hardware/avm/b1.c
> +++ b/drivers/isdn/hardware/avm/b1.c
[...]
> @@ -634,18 +636,17 @@ irqreturn_t b1_interrupt(int interrupt, void *devptr)
> }
>
> /* ------------------------------------------------------------- */
> -int b1ctl_read_proc(char *page, char **start, off_t off,
> - int count, int *eof, struct capi_ctr *ctrl)
> +static int b1ctl_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> {
> + struct capi_ctr *ctrl = m->private;
> avmctrl_info *cinfo = (avmctrl_info *)(ctrl->driverdata);
> avmcard *card = cinfo->card;
> u8 flag;
[...]

So I guess the paragraph Documentation/isdn/INTERFACE.CAPI needs to be
adapted to describe correctly where the callbacks will find their
controller data structure after that change.

OTOH, the new proc_show functions sport a second argument void *v that
doesn't appear to get used anywhere. It would be nice if that could be
explained a bit somewhere.

Thanks,
Tilman


--
Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-28 13:29    [W:0.052 / U:0.636 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site