lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with the m68k tree
Hi Geert,

On 11/27/2009 06:43 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 05:43, Greg Ungerer<gerg@snapgear.com> wrote:
>> Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 01:58, Stephen Rothwell<sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Today's linux-next merge of the m68knommu tree got a conflict in
>>>> arch/m68k/include/asm/ptrace.h between commit
>>>> 63c361b65f6540043c4baabf1a044a45c7465858 ("m68k: use generic code for
>>>> ptrace requests") from the m68k tree and commit
>>>> 03a03164e8084b810e9f92906a51232d63bac72c ("m68knommu: define
>>>> arch_has_single_step() and friends") from the m68knommu tree.
>>>>
>>>> These mostly add the same stuff but not quite :-(
>>>
>>> Ah sorry, my bad. I'm not yet used to the uClinux guys touching "my"
>>> includes ;-)
>>> So we need better coordination between us.
>>>
>>> IIRC, Greg's changes were inspired by Andreas' patch.
>>
>> Yes, largely they are.
>>
>>
>>>> I have done a fixup (see below) and can carry it as necessary. Please
>>>> check the result.
>>>
>>> At first sight, it looks OK. Thanks for fixing it up!
>>
>> Yep, looks ok from what I can see.
>>
>> Geert, how do you want to handle for the real linus merge?
>> Do you want me to drop the changes to ptrace.h from that patch?
>
> I can apply your patch (modified to apply on top of Andreas') to the
> m68k for-linus branch.
> Does that sound OK for you?

Yep, thats fine by me.

Regards
Greg



>>>> --
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
>>>>
>>>> diff --cc arch/m68k/include/asm/ptrace.h
>>>> index eef9309,beb2091..0000000
>>>> --- a/arch/m68k/include/asm/ptrace.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/m68k/include/asm/ptrace.h
>>>> @@@ -86,14 -84,15 +86,18 @@@ struct switch_stack
>>>> extern void show_regs(struct pt_regs *);
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>> - * These are defined as per linux/ptrace.h.
>>>> + * These are defined as per linux/ptrace.h, which see.
>>>> */
>>>> + struct task_struct;
>>>> +
>>>> -#ifndef CONFIG_MMU
>>>> -#define arch_has_single_step() (1)
>>>> +#define arch_has_single_step() (1)
>>>> extern void user_enable_single_step(struct task_struct *);
>>>> extern void user_disable_single_step(struct task_struct *);
>>>> +
>>>> ++#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
>>>> +#define arch_has_block_step() (1)
>>>> +extern void user_enable_block_step(struct task_struct *);
>>>> + #endif
>>>>
>>>> #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
>>>> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
>

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: gerg@snapgear.com
SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
8 Gardner Close, FAX: +61 7 3891 3630
Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-27 12:35    [W:0.508 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site