lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC] Should we create a raw input interface for IR's ? - Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] lirc core device driver infrastructure
    On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:27:08PM +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
    > Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com> writes:
    >
    > > No. All the other API functions there work with 32 bits for scancodes.
    >
    > We don't need them, do we? We need a new ioctl for changing key mappings
    > anyway (a single ioctl for setting the whole table I think), and we can
    > have arbitrary length of scan codes there.

    Unless we determine that we 100% need bigger size of scancode then the
    current ioctls are just fine. Why do we _need_ an ioctl to load the whole
    tabe? Are you concerned about speed with which the keymap is populated?
    I don't think it would be an issue.

    --
    Dmitry


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-11-27 00:17    [W:0.025 / U:0.312 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site