[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] Should we create a raw input interface for IR's ? - Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] lirc core device driver infrastructure
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:27:08PM +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <> writes:
> > No. All the other API functions there work with 32 bits for scancodes.
> We don't need them, do we? We need a new ioctl for changing key mappings
> anyway (a single ioctl for setting the whole table I think), and we can
> have arbitrary length of scan codes there.

Unless we determine that we 100% need bigger size of scancode then the
current ioctls are just fine. Why do we _need_ an ioctl to load the whole
tabe? Are you concerned about speed with which the keymap is populated?
I don't think it would be an issue.


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-27 00:17    [W:0.128 / U:0.644 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site