lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRE: [regression bisect -next] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: rmmod

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-kernel-
> owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Eric Paris
> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 9:43 PM
> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: hpa@zytor.com; a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl; efault@gmx.de;
> tglx@linutronix.de; mingo@elte.hu
> Subject: [regression bisect -next] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in
> preemptible [00000000] code: rmmod
>
> I get a slew of these on boot.
>
> [ 4.590699] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000]
> code: rmmod/1314
> [ 4.593043] caller is task_hot+0x86/0xd0
> [ 4.593872] Pid: 1314, comm: rmmod Tainted: G W 2.6.32-rc3-
> fanotify #127
> [ 4.595443] Call Trace:
> [ 4.596177] [<ffffffff812ad35b>] debug_smp_processor_id+0x11b/0x120
> [ 4.597337] [<ffffffff81051d66>] task_hot+0x86/0xd0
> [ 4.598320] [<ffffffff81066275>] set_task_cpu+0x115/0x270
> [ 4.599368] [<ffffffff810985ab>] kthread_bind+0x6b/0x100
> [ 4.600354] [<ffffffff810914f0>] start_workqueue_thread+0x30/0x60
> [ 4.601545] [<ffffffff810941dd>] __create_workqueue_key+0x18d/0x2f0
> [ 4.602526] [<ffffffff810d9bee>] stop_machine_create+0x4e/0xd0
> [ 4.603811] [<ffffffff810c5818>] sys_delete_module+0x98/0x250
> [ 4.604922] [<ffffffff810e2505>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x205/0x290
> [ 4.606202] [<ffffffff81013202>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>
> f685ceacab07d3f6c236f04803e2f2f0dbcc5afb is first bad commit commit
> f685ceacab07d3f6c236f04803e2f2f0dbcc5afb
> Author: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
> Date: Fri Oct 23 23:09:22 2009 +0200
>
> sched: Strengthen buddies and mitigate buddy induced latencies
>
> This patch restores the effectiveness of LAST_BUDDY in preventing
> pgsql+oltp from collapsing due to wakeup preemption. It also
> switches LAST_BUDDY to exclusively do what it does best, namely
> mitigate the effects of aggressive wakeup preemption, which
> improves vmark throughput markedly, and restores mysql+oltp
> scalability.
>
> [snip]

Hi -

I have same oops (different cause-vector). Details here http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/23/548

Can anyone tell me if they are related and/or recommend any work-arounds or troubleshooting steps?

Could this be related to scheduler trying to reschedule a task/thread on other proc and possibly a false alarm?

Snip from trace is below.

-Bob

Nov 23 17:24:15 localhost kernel: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible
[00000000] code: smash/3062
Nov 23 17:24:15 localhost kernel: caller is __schedule+0x93/0x7d4
Nov 23 17:24:15 localhost kernel: Pid: 3062, comm: smash Not tainted
2.6.31.6-rt19 #1
Nov 23 17:24:15 localhost kernel: Call Trace:
Nov 23 17:24:15 localhost kernel: [<c06dc3df>] ? printk+0xf/0x18
Nov 23 17:24:15 localhost kernel: [<c05499a6>] debug_smp_processor_id+0xa6/0xbc
Nov 23 17:24:15 localhost kernel: [<c06dc70e>] __schedule+0x93/0x7d4
Nov 23 17:24:15 localhost kernel: [<c046621f>] ? audit_syscall_exit+0xfa/0x10f
Nov 23 17:24:15 localhost kernel: [<c040a955>] ? syscall_trace_leave+0xc8/0xef
Nov 23 17:24:15 localhost kernel: [<c040338a>] work_resched+0x5/0x19
Nov 23 17:24:15 localhost kernel: __ratelimit: 6 callbacks suppressed
Nov 23 17:24:15 localhost kernel: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible
[00000000] code: smash/3062
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-26 18:13    [W:0.167 / U:0.176 seconds]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site