[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [rfc] "fair" rw spinlocks
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 09:49:23AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> David Miller <> writes:
> >
> > I think nobody would notice if you changed tasklist_lock into
> > a spinlock_t, and this would solve the DoS because at least on
> > x86 you'd end up with the ticket spinlocks.
> iirc tasklist_lock was one of them who could be potentially nested.
> So just turning it into a spinlock might deadlock.

It can be nested I think due to interrupt context. But if the read
side disables interrupts too, then I think it should be OK (though
I haven't audited this closely).

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-25 09:59    [W:0.112 / U:0.756 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site