[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [rfc] "fair" rw spinlocks
    On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 09:49:23AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
    > David Miller <> writes:
    > >
    > > I think nobody would notice if you changed tasklist_lock into
    > > a spinlock_t, and this would solve the DoS because at least on
    > > x86 you'd end up with the ticket spinlocks.
    > iirc tasklist_lock was one of them who could be potentially nested.
    > So just turning it into a spinlock might deadlock.

    It can be nested I think due to interrupt context. But if the read
    side disables interrupts too, then I think it should be OK (though
    I haven't audited this closely).

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-11-25 09:59    [W:0.024 / U:50.756 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site