lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: lockdep complaints in slab allocator
    On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:12:30PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
    > On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 13:03 -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
    > > On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
    > >
    > > > Merge SLQB and rm mm/sl[ua]b.c include/linux/sl[ua]b.h for .33-rc1
    > > >
    > >
    > > slqb still has a 5-10% performance regression compared to slab for
    > > benchmarks such as netperf TCP_RR on machines with high cpu counts,
    > > forcing that type of regression isn't acceptable.
    >
    > Having _4_ slab allocators is equally unacceptable.

    I completely agree. We need at least ten. ;-)

    Thanx, Paul


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-11-24 22:51    [W:0.022 / U:60.700 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site