Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:27:06 -0700 | From | Grant Grundler <> | Subject | Re: [PATCHSET 0-5] remove unneeded nfsd #includes |
| |
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 07:58:15PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > Some arch files had unneeded #includes directives from linux/nfsd/*. > Some vfs files had unneeded #includes directives from linux/nfsd/*. ... > patches: > [PATCH 1/5] parsic: remove unused nfsd #includes > Some kind soul, please compile with this patch? compile > is all that's needed.
Boaz, linux-2.6 compiles for parisc with this patch. Please add: Tested-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>
thanks, grant
> > [PATCH 2/5] sparc: remove unused nfsd #includes > [PATCH 3/5] s390: remove unused nfsd #includes > These two were cross compiled. Should we submit them through > nfsd tree or the ARCH trees? > > [PATCH 4/5] vfs: nfsctl.c unused nfsd #includes > [PATCH 5/5] lockd: Remove unused nfsd headers #includes > Can these patches go through the nfsd tree? > Who's ACKs should we collect? Andrew? > > Bruce Hi > With this set applied, the only nfsd files used publicly are: > const.h export.h nfsfh.h stats.h syscall.h > > These files can be moved to source folder: > cache.h debug.h nfsd.h state.h xdr3.h xdr4.h xdr.h > > Why is debug.h exported from Kernel? (include/linux/nfsd/Kbuild) > > So just to see how this move might look like see last patch: > [RFC] nfsd: Move private headers to source directory > This patch was compiled, as well, on x86(32/64), sparc64, s390 > > Thanks > Boaz > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| |