lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: lockdep complaints in slab allocator
    From
    Date
    On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 13:03 -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
    > On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
    >
    > > Merge SLQB and rm mm/sl[ua]b.c include/linux/sl[ua]b.h for .33-rc1
    > >
    >
    > slqb still has a 5-10% performance regression compared to slab for
    > benchmarks such as netperf TCP_RR on machines with high cpu counts,
    > forcing that type of regression isn't acceptable.

    Having _4_ slab allocators is equally unacceptable.



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-11-24 22:17    [W:0.020 / U:91.616 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site