Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:47:03 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/5] perf kmem: Add more functions and show more statistics |
| |
* Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:
> Hi Ingo, > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > > Certainly we can postpone it, as long as there's rough strategic > > consensus on the way forward. I'd hate to have two overlapping core > > kernel facilities and friction between the groups pursuing them and > > constant distraction from having two targets. > > Sure, like I said, I think "kmem perf" is the way forward. The only > reason we did kmemtrace userspace out-of-tree was because there was no > perf (or ftrace!) at the time and there wasn't much interest in > putting userspace tools in the tree. > > I hope that counts as a "rough strategic consensus" :-)
it does :-)
Ingo
| |