Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:28:55 -0800 | From | Yinghai Lu <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86: fix gart iommu using for amd 64 bit system |
| |
Ingo Molnar wrote: > * FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > >>> don't think user will like to use SWIOTLB instead of swiotlb. >> I doubt that users care about a way to fix their problems. > > As far as swiotlb vs. GART goes, arguably a non-bouncing hw based > solution (GART) is superior to a bouncing one (swiotlb), right? >
yes, should use GART if possible.
YH
| |