lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86: fix gart iommu using for amd 64 bit system
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>
>>> don't think user will like to use SWIOTLB instead of swiotlb.
>> I doubt that users care about a way to fix their problems.
>
> As far as swiotlb vs. GART goes, arguably a non-bouncing hw based
> solution (GART) is superior to a bouncing one (swiotlb), right?
>

yes, should use GART if possible.

YH


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-24 19:33    [W:0.079 / U:0.292 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site