lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Bug 14658] Regression in efi.c
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, indexer wrote:
>
>>> while the bisect should have be done with
>>>
>>> good 2.6.30
>>> bad 2.6.31
>>>
>>> William, could you please go through the bisect pain again?
>>>
>>>
>> I had already done a similar bisect to this in private conversation to Huang
>> Ying, and is what prompted me to expand my bisect out. I redid it regardless
>> and will send you the information.
>>
>> commit 74fca6a42863ffacaf7ba6f1936a9f228950f657
>> Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
>> Date: Wed Sep 9 15:13:59 2009 -0700
>>
>> Linux 2.6.31
>>
>> Makefile | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>
> So you are saying that
>
>
>> # good: [7135a71b19be1faf48b7148d77844d03bc0717d6] aoe: allocate unused
>> request_queue for sysfs
>> git bisect good 7135a71b19be1faf48b7148d77844d03bc0717d6
>>
>
> which is the last code changing commit before the 2.6.31 release is
> booting fine, but with the release commit which merily changes the
> Makefile it is not ?
>
I dont know, I will test this as soon as possible. I might change the
bisect parameters a bit, but really im quite new to all this. It may
also be a possibility it is gen-patches breaking it as i reported
2.6.30-gentoo was the broken kernel. Either way, the fact remains that
on 2.6.31 and higher vanilla it is broken.
>
>> PS - The fact remains i still cant efi boot in 2.6.32-rc7, so this bug still
>> exists, and I will keep doing what i can to help track this down.
>>
>
> Sure, but I hope we agree that it does not make much sense to search
> 2.6.31..now when we already know that 2.6.31 is not booting and the
> change which causes the problem is between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
Oh i have no issues agreeing with you, but its really confusing me, and
i of course may have made an error in what i reported. I am after all
only human, and i might have made a mistake, and this is the first time
i have ever submitted a bug, let alone found one like this. The end
product is that 2.6.32 doesn't boot, but maybe the last working version
was not 2.6.30-rc8, maybe it was a 2.6.31 kernel. I might redo the
bisect and try this out again, as i'm quite intent on finding the source
of this. I will also see if i can get my hands on another x86_64 linux
install with efi to test it on a different machine to see if it is
hardware specific to my computer. For the record i am running a late
2009 macbook pro gen 5 rev 3, efi version 1.7 with refit and elilo.

William


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-23 12:13    [W:0.052 / U:0.716 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site