lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] perf: Add 'perf kmem' tool
Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Ingo Molnar kirjoitti:
>> Regarding patch 2 - can we set some definitive benchmark threshold for
>> that? I.e. a list of must-have features in 'perf kmem' before we can
>> do it? 100% information and analysis equivalency with kmemtrace-user
>> tool?
>
> I'd be interested to hear Eduard's comment on that.
>
> That said, I'll try to find some time to test "perf kmem" and provide
> feedback on that. I can ACK the patch when I'm happy with the output. :-)
>
> I'm mostly interested in two scenarios: (1) getting a nice report on
> worst fragmented call-sites (perf kmem needs symbol lookup) and

This will be done in next version.

> (2) doing "perf kmem record" on machine A (think embedded here) and then
> "perf kmem report" on machine B. I haven't tried kmemtrace-user for a
> while but it did support both of them quite nicely at some point.
>

Everything needed and machine-specific will be recorded in perf.data,
so this should already been supported. I'll try it.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-20 09:57    [W:0.208 / U:0.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site