[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/7] Kill PF_MEMALLOC abuse
    On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:

    > > I agree in principle with removing non-VM users of PF_MEMALLOC, but I
    > > think it should be left to the individual subsystem maintainers to apply
    > > or ack since the allocations may depend on the __GFP_NORETRY | ~__GFP_WAIT
    > > behavior of PF_MEMALLOC. This could be potentially dangerous for a
    > > PF_MEMALLOC user if allocations made by the kthread, for example, should
    > > never retry for orders smaller than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER or block on
    > > direct reclaim.
    > if there is so such reason. we might need to implement another MM trick.
    > but keeping this strage usage is not a option. All memory freeing activity
    > (e.g. page out, task killing) need some memory. we need to protect its
    > emergency memory. otherwise linux reliability decrease dramatically when
    > the system face to memory stress.

    Right, that's why I agree with trying to remove non-VM use of PF_MEMALLOC,
    but I think this patchset needs to go through the individual subsystem
    maintainers so they can ensure the conversion doesn't cause undesirable
    results if their kthreads' memory allocations depend on the __GFP_NORETRY
    behavior that PF_MEMALLOC ensures. Otherwise it looks good.

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-11-17 09:39    [W:0.020 / U:9.376 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site