[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/4] powerpc: Fix minor build issues on 2.6.32-rc7 without CONFIG_XICS set
    On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 23:39 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
    > On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 12:07 +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
    > > KConfig doesn't require CONFIG_XICS to be set with CONFIG_PSERIES but if
    > > it's not set, there are numerous small build errors. This is a small series
    > > of patches to allow CONFIG_XICS to be unset in the config.
    > >
    > > XICS appears to be some sort of interrupt controller but I'm not sure how
    > > common it is on systems that require CONFIG_PSERIES. If CONFIG_PSERIES
    > > universally requires CONFIG_XICS, the better path might be to force it to
    > > be set.
    > It is indeed 'some sort of interrupt controller' :)
    > All the virtualised PSERIES systems have, or appear to have, a XICS. So
    > it's pretty common.
    > I think the only time you see an MPIC is on older machines, and even
    > then maybe only if you're running bare metal.
    > So it is pretty much required for a PSERIES kernel, but perhaps there
    > are cases where the BML guys want to be able to turn it off.

    In fact this series makes me wonder whether we can drop support for a
    single kernel image with pseries XICS & MPIC support.

    If we could drop that requirement we could have a single set of names,
    ie. API, for the irq routines and build either the XICS or MPIC

    That would avoid all the code that needs a setup_foo_xics() and
    setup_foo_mpic() - it'd just be setup_foo(), implemented by either the
    XICS or MPIC code.


    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-11-17 13:55    [W:0.023 / U:63.744 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site