Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:06:49 +0530 | From | Arun R Bharadwaj <> | Subject | Re: [v9 PATCH 0/9]: cpuidle: Cleanup cpuidle/ Introduce cpuidle to POWER. |
| |
* Arun R Bharadwaj <arun@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [2009-10-16 15:08:50]:
> Hi, > > This patchset introduces cpuidle infrastructure to POWER, prototyping > for pSeries, and also does a major refactoring of current x86 idle > power management and a cleanup of cpuidle infrastructure. > > This patch series has been in discussion for quite a while now and > below are the links to the previous discussions. > > Hopefully, this is ready to be included in the -tip tree. > > v8 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/8/82 > v7 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/6/278 > v6 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/22/180 > v5 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/22/26 > v4 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/1/133 > v3 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/27/124 > v2 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/26/233 > v1 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/19/150 > > > Changes in this version: > ---------------------------------------- > *Added documentation for the new design regarding registration > of idle routines in Documentation/cpuidle/core.txt > > *Platforms which do not want the code bloat of cpuidle can > disable CONFIG_CPU_IDLE. Alternate definition of > cpuidle_idle_call is provided which would call the appropriate > idle routine provided by the arch without the overhead of > registration and governors. > (Thanks to Andi for raising this isuue) > > *I had missed a cpuidle_kick_cpus() in > cpuidle_pause_and_lock() which is called from the hotplug > path. So added that and tested this patchset by subjecting it > to cpuhotplug torture. > (Thanks to Balbir for noticing this) > >
Hi Peter,
Did you get time to look at this series? Please let me know if we need any changes to this version to get it merged.
thanks > --arun >
| |