lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] libata: remove experimental tag on PATA drivers
    Date
    On Saturday 14 November 2009 01:15:10 Alan Cox wrote:
    > On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 00:46:29 +0100
    > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    > > On Friday 13 November 2009 19:25:15 Alan Cox wrote:
    > > > > Fine but please update status of following host drivers that were
    > > > > marked as "stable" prematurely by commit e3389cb first:
    > > > >
    > > > > PATA_PDC_OLD: needs to be marked as EXPERIMENTAL (or just BROKEN)
    > > > > - known reliability problems with UDMA
    > > >
    > > > A few odd reports apparently linked to specific chip revs. It's at
    > > > least as stable as the old IDE one which doesn't work on my hardware. I'd
    > >
    > > Skipping the technical merit of the quoted text for the moment -- I find
    >
    > You mean the content ?
    >
    > > the fact that you keep calling the present IDE host drivers (that many
    > > developers helped to fix) as "old" ones or "buggy" ones rather degrading
    >
    > As you quoted the old PDC202xx driver does not work on my test hardware.
    > The libata one does. That is what is popularly known as a "fact". I'm not

    You want facts? Here we go:

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250349
    https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457037
    https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/399616

    > entirely happy with either PDC driver for older chips and I've spent
    > considerable time grovelling through old drivers, alternate drivers and
    > what little documentation exists to try and figure it out in more detail.
    >
    > The lost IRQ recovery patches seem to have helped a fair bit, and your
    > UDMA33 fix likewise.

    I regret this work -- because of it I share the blame for the new driver
    and keep getting complains about it..

    > > for their (this includes me of course) hard work.
    >
    > All because you wouldn't work on the libata ones which had a future. You

    The rest of your mail is "the same good old straw-man" to put me back
    into specially created for me by you & co. "difficult to work with" box.

    Guys, "the devil" has been long out of the box.. :)

    --
    Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-11-14 02:13    [W:0.047 / U:88.100 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site