lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC] [X86] performance improvement for memcpy_64.S by fast string.

> Ling, if you are interested, could you send a user-space test-app to
> this thread that everyone could just compile and run on various older
> boxes, to gather a performance profile of hand-coded versus string ops
> performance?
>
> ( And i think we can make a judgement based on cache-hot performance
> alone - if then the strings ops will perform comparatively better in
> cache-cold scenarios, so the cache-hot numbers would be a conservative
> estimate. )

Ugh, really? I'd expect cache-cold performance to be not helped at all
(memory bandwidth limit) and you'll get slow down from additional
i-cache misses...
Pavel

--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-13 00:07    [W:0.123 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site