lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Kernel oops in resched_task() with 2.6.31.5
Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 21:31 +0900, Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I frequently encounter the kernel oops attached below in resched_task()
>>> with 2.6.31.5. This kernel oops happens also with 2.6.32-rc5. I don't
>>> know about other kernel.
>>>
>>> Here is my analysis:
>>>
>>> The immediate cause of this kernel oops is that NULL was passed to
>>> resched_task() from resched_cpu(). From my investigation, this was
>>> caused as follows:
>>>
>>> - trigger_load_balance() caluculated cpu number of idle load balancer
>>> using find_new_ilb(), and find_new_ilb() returned *offline* CPU
>>> number (16 in my case). Note that I didn't do any CPU hotplug
>>> operation. On my system, present, online and offline under
>>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/ are
>>>
>>> [kanesige@localhost ~]$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/present
>>> 0-15
>>> [kanesige@localhost ~]$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/online
>>> 0-15
>>> [kanesige@localhost ~]$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/offline
>>> 16-255
>>>
>>> And nr_cpu_ids is 256.
>>>
>>> - resched_cpu() calculated current task by cpu_curr() with offline CPU
>>> number.
>>>
>>> So this kernel oops seems to be caused by invalid CPU number returned
>>> from find_new_ilb(). I don't know the find_new_ilb() implementation,
>>> but I suspect the initialization of cpumasks used by find_new_ilb().
>>> The patch attached below seems to fix the problem (With this patch,
>>> the kernel oops doesn't happen). But I don't know if this is the
>>> correct fix.
>>
>> Please send patches against -tip.
>>
>> You might find that Rusty has already fixed a similar issue there in
>> commit: 49557e620339cb134127b5bfbcfecc06b77d0232.
>>
>> Now, Rusty's patch does not clear the ilb mask, so maybe it doesn't
>> fully cover your issue, please test.
>>
>
> Thank you for quick response.
>
> I didn't notice Rusty's fix.
> I'll look at and test it tomorrow.
>

I tested Rusty's patch and confirmed it fixes the problem.

Thanks,
Kenji Kaneshige




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-10 06:15    [W:0.040 / U:0.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site