lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Oct]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Cleanups for: line length, printk KERN_ argument, stack frame size > 2048 (added a kmalloc/kfree), style/formatting errors, incorrect include files
From
Date
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 14:31 -0700, Bruce B wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 9, 2009, at 2:16 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>
> >
> > Try changing one thing at a time per patch please.
> >
> > There's some bugs in here:
> >
> >> - struct config_t dig_in_config[32];
> >> - struct config_t dig_out_config[32];
> >> - struct config_t chan_in_config[32];
> >> - struct config_t chan_out_config[32];
> >> int i;
> >> + config_data = kmalloc(sizeof(struct config_data_t), GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> > Shouldn't that be:
> > config_data = kmalloc(sizeof(struct config_data_t)*32, GFP_KERNEL);
>
>
> The structure already has the [32]'s copied from the original defn's.
> If you like... I can still break up the commit into two patches. Also,
> moving the *32 out isn't a bad idea; were I
> to break it up, I would likely do so.

I would break it up .. Especially pulling out run time changes from
cleanups .. Also neither patch has a sign off line, and this patch
actually adds one line over 80 so that at least doesn't go along with
your subject..

If your going to respin this patches your first patch "[PATCH] Cleanup:
indent/format errors, printk calls." added some trailing whitespace too.
So you could do both..

Daniel



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-10-10 00:09    [W:0.062 / U:1.796 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site