lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Oct]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] vmscan: separate sc.swap_cluster_max and sc.nr_max_reclaim
KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Rafael, Can you please review this patch series?
>
> I found shrink_all_memory() is not fast at all on my numa system.
> I think this patch series fixes it.
>
>
> ==============================================================
> Currently, sc.scap_cluster_max has double meanings.
>
> 1) reclaim batch size as isolate_lru_pages()'s argument
> 2) reclaim baling out thresolds
>
> The two meanings pretty unrelated. Thus, Let's separate it.
> this patch doesn't change any behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>

Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>

--
All rights reversed.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-10-09 22:37    [W:0.048 / U:0.524 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site