Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:33:51 -0400 | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] vmscan: separate sc.swap_cluster_max and sc.nr_max_reclaim |
| |
KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > Rafael, Can you please review this patch series? > > I found shrink_all_memory() is not fast at all on my numa system. > I think this patch series fixes it. > > > ============================================================== > Currently, sc.scap_cluster_max has double meanings. > > 1) reclaim batch size as isolate_lru_pages()'s argument > 2) reclaim baling out thresolds > > The two meanings pretty unrelated. Thus, Let's separate it. > this patch doesn't change any behavior. > > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
-- All rights reversed.
| |