Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] perf trace: support for general-purpose scripting | From | Tom Zanussi <> | Date | Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:01:20 -0500 |
| |
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 11:09 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Known problems/shortcomings: > > > > Probably the biggest problem right now is the sorting hack I added as > > the last patch. It's just meant as a temporary thing, but is there > > because tracing scripts in general want to see events in the order > > they happened i.e. timestamp order. [...] > > Btw., have you seen the -M/--multiplex option to perf record? It > multiplexes all events into a single buffer - making them all ordered. > (The events are in causal ordering in this case even if there's some TSC > asynchronity) >
No, I didn't know about that - thanks for letting me know.
Tom
> Ingo
| |