lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Oct]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [GIT PULL] SCSI fixes for 2.6.32-rc3
    On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:54:02 +0000 James Bottomley wrote:

    > On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 08:58 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > >
    > > On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, James Bottomley wrote:
    > > >
    > > > This is mostly fixes. However, it contains two new drivers: Brocade SAS
    > > > (bfa), the Bladengine2 iSCSI (be2iscsi) under the merge window exemption
    > >
    > > Btw, I'm getting less excited about the merge window exemption.
    > >
    > > It makes sense for consumer devices that people actually hit and that are
    > > needed for bringup (ie they make a difference between a system that can be
    > > installed and used, and one that cannot), but I'm not at all sure it makes
    > > sense for things like this.
    > >
    > > The _reason_ for the driver exemption was the fact that even a broken
    > > driver is better than no driver at all for somebody who just can't get a
    > > working system without it, but that argument really goes away when the
    > > driver is so specialized that it's not about regular hardware any more.
    >
    > OK, so I don't see a huge distinction here. This is a driver for a
    > piece of enterprise HW that Linux previously didn't support. To someone
    > cursing not being able to use there hardware, it's every bit as
    > important as the latest wireless driver.
    >
    > > And the whole "driver exemption" seems to have become a by-word for "I can
    > > ignore the merge window for 50% of my code". Which makes me very tired of
    > > it if there aren't real advantages to real users.
    >
    > While the exemption exists, I can certainly ignore the merge window for
    > new drivers, yes ... however, that's not 50% of the code submitted in
    > the merge window, and it's one time ... the same driver follows the
    > merge window for the next release. I try to police this pretty rigidly
    > in SCSI ... as you do at the top.

    polices it so rigidly that even simple kernel-doc patches sit in a
    scsi git tree for months. :(


    ---
    ~Randy


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-10-06 23:11    [W:0.022 / U:89.208 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site