Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 3 Oct 2009 09:20:21 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: IO scheduler based IO controller V10 |
| |
* Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
> unsigned int cfq_desktop; > + unsigned int cfq_desktop_dispatch;
> - if (cfq_cfqq_idle_window(cfqq) && cfqd->rq_in_driver[BLK_RW_ASYNC]) > + if (cfq_cfqq_idle_window(cfqq) && cfqd->rq_in_driver[BLK_RW_ASYNC]) { > + cfqd->desktop_dispatch_ts = jiffies; > return 0; > + }
btw., i hope all those desktop_ things will be named latency_ pretty soon as the consensus seems to be - the word 'desktop' feels so wrong in this context.
'desktop' is a form of use of computers and the implication of good latencies goes far beyond that category of systems.
Ingo
| |