lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Do not overload dispatch queue (Was: Re: IO scheduler based IO controller V10)
From
Date
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 16:28 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 03 2009, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 09:56 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> >
> > > I have kept the overload delay period as "cfq_slice_sync" same as Mike had
> > > done. We shall have to experiment what is a good waiting perioed. Is 100ms
> > > too long if we are waiting for a request from same process which recently
> > > finished IO and we did not enable idle on it.
> > >
> > > I guess we can tweak the delay period as we move along.
> >
> > I kept the delay period very short to minimize possible damage. Without
> > the idle thing, it wasn't enough, but with, worked a treat, as does your
> > patch.
>
> Can you test the current line up of patches in for-linus? It has the
> ramp up I talked about included as well.

Sure. I'll go find it.

-Mike



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-10-03 16:35    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans