Messages in this thread | | | From | Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <> | Subject | Re: pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2009-10-28 | Date | Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:48:42 +0100 |
| |
On Thursday 29 October 2009 20:45:07 Pekka Enberg wrote: > Hi Bart, > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > <bzolnier@gmail.com> wrote: > >> lots of cleanups to the staging drivers, why not direct some of that > >> energy to the drivers/net/wireless ones? > > > > When did we start to apply "fix it yourself" rule instead of "submitter > > should fix it" one to the _new_ code.. > > Don't be silly, I didn't say that.
Sorry, I must have misunderstood you.
> I was simply pointing out that your time would probably be better > spent in improving the "proper" ralink wireless drivers but if you
Thanks for the concern. However recent discussions made my realize how I should really be spending my time effectively way too well.
> _really_ prefer to spend your time in pointless arguments, go ahead.
I don't think that my technical arguments are pointless.
Quite the contrary, I'm pretty confident that addressing my review concerns would result in better RT28x00 / RT30x0 support in the very near future.
> It should be pretty obvious by now that the best way to improve things > is to work with the relevant maintainers, not against them. (Unless > you wish your work to be ignored, of course.)
I work with a lot of other maintainers. I would say that providing valuable review feedback is also "working with" (at least I would be very happy with such feedback in my projects).
-- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
| |