lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Oct]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: is avoiding compat ioctls possible?
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 01:11:41AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:59:08 +0100
>
> >> }
> >> - chunk_array_ptr = (uint64_t *)(unsigned long)(cs->chunks);
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> >> + if (is_compat_task())
> >
> > Are the COMPAT ifdefs really needed? The compiler should optimize that
> > away anyways on non compat aware architectures, shouldn't it?
>
> There are no non-compat is_compat_task() definitions, nor are there
> non-compat build definitions of compat_uptr_t and the assosciated
> interfaces.

That seems wrong then, better fix that too? It would be certainly better
than adding a lot of ifdefs.

-Andi

--
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-10-28 09:21    [W:0.111 / U:0.584 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site