lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: FatELF & patents

> However, there are 20 claims in the patent. Just using a different way
> to store the architecture independent header might not be enough.

I'm not a lawyer, so I don't have anything to add to this except that
FatELF has a few fields that Apple's format doesn't, so the flow chart
they specify isn't the same. I don't really know enough about how
patents work.

Any lawyers around that can comment on this? Is this something to be
concerned with (and if so, what sort of changes would make FatELF not
violate the patent), or is this all just business as usual?

--ryan.




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-10-26 19:45    [W:0.058 / U:0.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site