[lkml]   [2009]   [Oct]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] to rebase or not to rebase on linux-next
    Steven Rostedt wrote:
    > Some of the reasons for the constant rebasing are:
    > 1) the patches are held in quilt, which just by nature leads to
    > rebasing. These developers find that quilt is the best tool for the
    > job.

    It shouldn't be difficult to implement a git-quiltimport porcelain which
    - remembers a previous import of a quilt tree,
    - compares that one ( = an existing branch) with a new quilt import
    ( = a new branch),
    - reuses all commits of the old import which have identical diffs/
    changelog/ authorship/ parent changeset as ones in the new import,
    - discards (or reverts?) commits of the old import that don't match
    the new import in this way,
    - finally rebases all remaining commits from the new import onto the
    kept old ones.

    [OTOH the whole discussion is not about stable SHA1s in linux-next per
    se, AFAIU, but about stability of (the history of) the code which is
    released into linux-next, or about misuse of linux-next for more than
    final integration-testing...?]
    Stefan Richter
    -=====-==--= =-=- ==---

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-10-24 14:55    [W:0.021 / U:20.768 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site