lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Oct]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH -v4 4/9] tracing: add static function tracer support for MIPS
From
Date
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 11:34 -0700, David Daney wrote:
> Wu Zhangjin wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 11:24 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> [...]
> >>> +
> >>> +NESTED(_mcount, PT_SIZE, ra)
> >>> + RESTORE_SP_FOR_32BIT
> >>> + PTR_LA t0, ftrace_stub
> >>> + PTR_L t1, ftrace_trace_function /* please don't use t1 later, safe? */
> >> Is t0 and t1 safe for mcount to use? Remember, mcount does not follow
> >> the dynamics of C function ABI.
> >
> > So, perhaps we can use the saved registers(a0,a1...) instead.
> >
>
> a0..a7 may not always be saved.
>
> You can use at, v0, v1 and all the temporary registers. Note that for
> the 64-bit ABIs sometimes the names t0-t4 shadow a4-a7. So for a 64-bit
> kernel, you can use: $1, $2, $3, $12, $13, $14, $15, $24, $25, noting
> that at == $1 and contains the callers ra. For a 32-bit kernel you can
> add $8, $9, $10, and $11

before the profiling source code(jal _mcount), there are only necessary
stack operations, nobody have touched the GPRs, so, I think we are safe
to use any of them, that's why the t0,t1 I have used not fail. and
'Cause the a0,a1 is used as the arguments to the real profiling
function, so, I will keep back to use t0, t1, as David Daney said $12,
$13 in 64bit and $8, $9 in 32bit.

Thanks!

Regards,
Wu Zhangjin



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-10-23 09:23    [W:0.109 / U:0.324 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site