[lkml]   [2009]   [Oct]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] binfmt_elf: FatELF support for kernel modules.
    On 10/19/09 21:54, Ryan C. Gordon wrote:
    > I can understand that concern, but I worry about refusing to take steps
    > that would aid free software developers in case it might help the
    > closed-source people, too.

    Any open source driver should be encouraged to be merged with mainline
    Linux so there's no need to distribute them separately. With the
    staging/ tree, that's easier than ever.

    I don't see much upside in making it "easier" to distribute binary-only
    open source drivers separately. (It wouldn't help that much, in the
    end; the modules would still be compiled for some finite set of kernels,
    and if the user wants to use something else they're still stuck.)

    > Those that will behave badly will do so regardless of file formats, but
    > distros shipping nothing but GPL'd software and in-tree drivers would
    > benefit from this more than another misguided company that probably
    > doesn't care about multiple CPU architectures anyhow.

    Well, ideally a fat module would allow modules for multiple kernels to
    be bundled together (same and/or different architectures), which is
    primarily useful for 3rd-party binary distributions.


     \ /
      Last update: 2009-10-24 00:27    [W:0.020 / U:0.200 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site